The proposal was the idea of a group of local parents, who were concerned about the break-up of their primary school communities as they moved towards secondary school. They identified a strong and increasing local need for more high quality mainstream, inclusive school places in SW Twickenham and surrounding areas. They wanted to create an inspirational school, with STEM and music specialisms, and a distinctive ethos to complement provision at other local schools.
The founding parent group enlisted the support of the Russell Education Trust, and built up a network of local ‘critical friends’ to help with various aspects of the application, including a senior leader from a large local primary school. The team then began awareness-raising in the local community.
In February 2012, scores of local parents gave out leaflets, talked to and emailed friends in order to help spread the word. Thanks to each and every one of you! Around 1400 local children were registered in just a few weeks, far exceeding our targets, and providing very strong evidence of local demand for our school.
The founding parent group first contacted the Russell Education Trust in January 2012, because they had read about its work on the Bristol Free School. RET had worked closely with Bristol's Parents' Voice group to turn their school vision into reality. They talked to the Bristol parents, as well as another group of parents that RET were working with in Hove. They researched other potential sponsors too, but liked the unique flexibility of RET's partnership model, which gave parents freedom to shape the school vision, whilst also providing the expertise they would need to deliver it. RET's connection to Education London, and history of involvement with the London Challenge, gave the parents further confidence that RET had the credentials to make the school a success.
Turing House will be a part of the local family of schools, working together on joint educational initiatives that benefit our whole community. Richmond schools participate in many joint initiatives, not just at student level, such as sporting events and primary/secondary links, but at a professional level too, for example through peer support for quality assurance. As well as his school leadership credentials our founding headteacher brings to the Borough a wealth of experience in educational consultancy, school improvement partnership, and Ofsted inspection, that will be a positive addition to existing networks. As the school grows, its staff will be encouraged to share/acquire knowledge and skills with their peers at other local schools, as part of their own professional development, and in the spirit of collaboration with the wider local teaching community.
At the moment, Richmond Borough has anomalously high numbers of children who don’t get a place at one of their top 3 preferred secondaries (and significant numbers don’t get any of their 6 choices!). It also has an anomalously high population of students who leave the local state sector completely at secondary transfer, either because they move to out-of-borough schools or switch to the private sector. We think these two facts are related and indicate a strong pent-up demand for more high quality local provision. Visit our Local Need page to read more about these issues.
As described on our Local Need page our school will fulfil both a demand need and an impending capacity need. The Local Authority have planned for Free Schools to help with future provision, and while we need to make the most of the opportunity to create our school while the funding is on offer, we also want to minimise the impact of our school on others.
Whenever a new school opens, there will be changes in local patterns of demand. However, the majority of Richmond’s excellent secondaries are highly oversubscribed and that is unlikely to change while their quality remains high.
There are two community academies on the Middlesex side of the borough which have historically been under capacity. However, council forecasts show that they too are expected to fill over time as a result of rising numbers of children transferring to secondary school, ongoing quality improvement initiatives and the completion of building projects.
We know that there are more than enough families in the area to fill up all of the existing schools and our new school too, provided we tailor our proposals to parental demand and ensure that we deliver on our quality commitments. We believe our area deserves a secondary system where quality is high across the board so that, for those pupils lucky enough to have a choice, schools 'compete' only on the distinctiveness of their ethos. Above all, we are committed to making a positive contribution to the local family of schools.
Richmond Council is coordinating plans for the 2017 opening of a new free school, the Richmond Upon Thames School (RTS), in partnership with Richmond College, Haymarket Publishing Ltd and Harlequins Rugby Club.
When those plans were approved some people were concerned that they might impact the establishment of Turing House, but there was no reason why it should have done so.
As evidenced in their free school application, RTS is needed in addition to Turing House, due to the huge bulge of children coming through the primary system. The Local Authority's most recent forecast assumed that there would be a secondary free school opening before then, and Turing House fulfils that expectation.
Quoting from the consultation document, published in March: "The Council’s forecast, taking into account as far as it can, the likely establishment of further free schools, suggests that further significant provision may be needed by September 2017". The project's website says: "We believe that by September 2017, there will be enough local children transferring into Year Six to fill Turing House and all the current schools, so another Secondary School based on the College site would meet the need for additional places at that point."
For more information on the demand for additional secondary school places, see our Local Need page.
Ideally schools will be established in areas where demand is high. However, in densely populated areas, where land is at a premium, that isn't always possible. As well as Turing House, two of RET's other schools have retained Admissions Points in the areas that their proposals were intended to serve, because they were unable to obtain a site in the immediate vicinity.
Paragraph 1.14 of the Admissions Code, permits the use of Catchment Areas provided they are reasonable and clearly defined. Another local secondary school, Waldegrave, has a defined catchment area in a location that is different to the school.
An Admissions Point is a means of defining the "centre of gravity" of a Catchment Area, without defining its outer boundary. We think this method of defining a catchment area reduces confusion. With a more traditional catchment area parents often wrongly assume that living within the boundary guarantees them a place, or that living outside of it prevents them from applying, neither of which is true.
Admissions Points (sometimes called Nodal Points) are becoming more common. Some schools, especially those intended to serve a wide area, are using transport hubs, such as train stations, as admissions points.